Analysis of Success Factors in the World Toy Industry Free Essay Example, 1000 words

The last but equally important success factor that can be associated with the toy industry is the type of toy that a particular company produces. According to quote (year), consumer behavior in the toy industry is shifted towards a part where there is a repeated endorsement for types of toys, which remains the order for buyers for a very long time. In the report by Key Note (2014), this is confirmed by a modern trend where tablets for children seem to have taken the place of traditional toys. Dynamism in production can, therefore, be noted as a perfect solution in the current endeavor by ensuring that toy manufacturing companies will look into ways by which they can incorporate features of the tablet technology into their products if they are to succeed in the UK market (quote). What are Green Toy s competitive advantages in the international toy market? 2 [184]In any competitive market, companies need the competitive advantage to win the favor of available consumers over their comp etitors (quote). This means that having competitive advantage makes it possible to survive in any competitive market (quote). We will write a custom essay sample on Analysis of Success Factors in the World Toy Industry or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Reading about Green Toy Inc. , an impression that is developed is that the company has benefited immensely from its brand equity. Meanwhile, brand equity is identified as a major competitive advantage, that makes companies and their brands identifiable to consumers (quote). Emphasising on how brand equity serves as a competitive advantage, quote (year) explained that consumers always wish for there to be variations on the market. But as the variety becomes many, they become skeptical on which products guarantee the quality they want. In a situation like this, these consumers tend to fall on companies with long-standing names in the industry from which they are buying from. This means that brand equity is a competitive advantage that older companies use over relatively new companies.

Common Gastrointestinal ( Gi ) Medical Emergency - 1424 Words

Pathophysiology Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most common gastrointestinal (GI) medical emergency that occurs in neonates. Although it commonly affects premature babies, it can happen in term babies as well. It usually occurs during the first two to four weeks of life in premature babies and in one to three days for up to one month in term babies. For the premature babies, their organs are not fully developed and it puts them at risk for disease. It is an acute inflammatory disease that is characterized by damage to the intestinal tract and can range from mucosal injury (the lining of the intestines), to full thickness necrosis (where the tissue dies) and perforation (where there is a hole in the intestine. The exact cause is unknown but some ideas are that babies have underdeveloped intestines, there may have been too little oxygen or blood flow to the intestines, injury to the intestinal tract, a heavy growth of bacteria in the intestines that erodes the intestinal wall, a nd formula feedings. Although NEC can occur anywhere in the intestines and colon, it commonly affects the terminal ileum (where the small intestine connects to the large intestine) and the proximal ascending colon. Assessment A baby with NEC may present with one or more of the following signs or symptoms: a swollen, red, or tender belly, that increased in girth; a feeding intolerance; delayed gastric emptying; decreased bowel sounds; constipation, diarrhea or bloody stools; a low or unstableShow MoreRelatedThe Inflammatory Bowel Disorder Known As Crohn s Disease ( Cd )1291 Words   |  6 PagesUlcerative Colitis, but it is much less common and it can affect both the large and small intestines. According to the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA), there are currently about 700,000 individuals in America currently suffering from CD (Foundation, 2015). Pathophysiology of Crohn’s Disease The pathogenesis of CD is defined as a â€Å"dysregulated proinflammatory response to commensal gut bacteria† (Lashner, 2013). CD can afflict any part of the gastrointestinal tract from mouth to anus, usuallyRead MoreAn Autosomal Dominant Disorder995 Words   |  4 PagesReport: A 49-year-old female presented to the emergency department with generalized weakness for seven days. Associated symptoms included nausea, hematemesis, bloody sputum, and transient intermittent dark stool. She denied: chest pain, dizziness, or chills. The patient has a history of extensive nosebleeds since adolescence that, according to the patient, could fill a cup with blood. Her condition has continued despite multiple admissions and medical therapies. The patient admits to a history ofRead MoreWhat is Pica?1163 Words   |  5 PagesThe definition of Pica is a term that is refers to ingesting, cravings or argues of substances that are not foods items. Some of the most common items indigested by patients with pica are dirt, sand, clay, glue, ice, chalk, beeswax, hair, and laundry starch. The reason for patients having this cravings is because the patient is diagnosed with a nutritional deficiency state, such as iron-deficiency like anemia and a number of many other physiological disturbances in humans brains it have been associatedRead MoreCase Study Of Acute Abdomen1716 Words   |  7 PagesPerforation †n=30† 80.00% 79.7% Intestinal obstruction †n=60† 81.67% 91.0% Total †n=200† 81.0% 83.0% Figure 1.Cholecystitis: US findings. Multiple gallstones associated with gallbladder wall thickened Figure 2. Invagination of 1 portion of the GI tract (intussusceptum) into the lumen of another (intussuscipiens); this is often referred to as the target sign when seen in the transverse plane because of the multiple layers of adjacent intestinal walls. Figure 3. Ultrasound of small intestinalRead MoreTaking a Look at Crohns Disease1552 Words   |  6 Pagesmay show a lack of interest in the social aspect of life due to illness, and may demonstrate these traits to avoid embarrassment. Jobs and work life have to be comprised, for example patients need to have bathroom timeouts as well as always have emergency bag ready. Nutritional aspects have to comprise due to the illness. There will need to be a high intake of fruits and vegetables for adequate nutritional intake. Certain fruits and vegetables like strawberries due to the small seeds and apples becauseRead MoreAutonomic Dysreflexia2559 Words   |  11 Pagesfunction below the level of injury. The degree varies between sensory and motor loss due to the level of injury (Lewis, 2014). There are three levels of injury, those being cervical, thoracic, and lumbar. Lumbar and cervical injuries are the most common due to movement and increased flexibility (Lewis, 2014). Depending on the degree of injury you may become a paraplegic or a tetraplegia. Paraplegia is a loss of sensation in the trunk and lower limbs due to the thoracic cord in the lumbar spineRead MorePathogram: Chronic Respiratory Failure Essays7624 Words   |  31 Pages Chamberlain College of Nursing NR 340: Critical Care |Assessment |Medical/Nursing Diagnoses |Treatment | |Brief review of the patient |Medical Diagnoses: |Therapeutic Modalities Read MoreAlcohol3150 Words   |  13 Pagesand respiration Possible death 0.45 + Death Death from respiratory arrest ________________________________________ Absorption Alcohol is absorbed from all parts of the gastrointestinal tract largely by simple diffusion into the blood. However the small intestine is by far the most efficient region of the gastrointestinal tract for alcohol absorption because of its very large surface area. In a fasting individual, it is generally agreed that 10% to 20% of a dose of alcohol is absorbed from theRead MoreEssay about module 4 PPA2319 Words   |  10 PagesLetters Represent Context Definition or Application within the Patient’s Chart Source Document From Jane’s Dare Medical Record found on bottom of Medical Record pages†¦ 1. ICD International Classifications of Diseases, Ninth Revision Published by WHO This is a systematic classification of diagnosis codes. These codes are numeric and alphanumeric codes that represent medical diagnoses ADMISSION SUMMARY 2. CM Clinical Modification This abbreviation out of context belongs collectivelyRead MoreThe Pathophysiology Of Ischaemic Stroke3490 Words   |  14 PagesIntroduction: Mr X, a 60 year- old Caucasian male, admitted to the stroke unit with a diagnosis Left MCA infract. He presented to the emergency department right sided hemiparesis, neglect of affected limbs, dysphasia and right side facial droop. He was on cardiac monitor for close observation for 48 hours. Stroke critical care pathway and commenced and care provided as per protocol.. Stroke is a serious and deadly condition including cerebral circulation within the brain and can extremely affect

Shermans Army An Examination Of The March To The Essay Example For Students

Sherman?s Army: An Examination Of The March To The Essay Sea And BeyondShermans Army:An Examination of The March to the Sea and BeyondThe Civil War is arguably the most interesting and enigmatic subject in American history. Even after rigorous study of the topic, it is difficult to fully comprehend the motives for the war. Part of this is because of the inherent complexity of the conflict, but it can also be attributed to the manner about which it is written historically. Much of the military history of the Civil War concerns itself with the broad tactics and strategies of the armies. Historians often focus solely on the command structure of the respective forces, and lump the soldiers under those commands in one group. An exception to this is Joseph T. Glathaars work, The March to the Sea and Beyond: Shermans Troops in the Savannah and Carolina Campaigns. The title of Glathaars work is misleading it implies that it is just another military history. Glathaar, however, examines Shermans march through the lenses of the common soldier, making the work more of a social history. Glathaar uses the diaries and journals of the enlisted men and junior officers to scrutinize their views of battle, their reasons for fighting, blacks, southern whites, camp life, foraging and pillaging, and the march itself. Glathaar makes it clear that he is not seeking to pass judgment on the participants of one of the most controversial military campaigns in history:My objective, however, is neither to condemn nor condone the behavior of Sherman and his men. As I see it, my job is not to cast moral judgment upon the conduct of others; rather, it is to ascertain exactly what they did and understand why they did it. Glathaar introduces the subject with a brief overview of the political and military situation in early 1864. The Army of the Potomac had experienced a series of military defeats, and President Lincoln had lost faith in several of his highest military commanders, resulting in their termination. Most notable among these was General McClellan, who accepted the Democratic nomination for President in 1864. It appeared as though the failures of the Army of the Potomac would essentially take the Presidency away from the Republicans until General Shermans successful Atlanta campaign. Therefore, the March to the Sea was not only strategically important in a military sense; its success or failure could determine the political leadership of the entire Union. Necessarily, Glathaar also conducts an abbreviated examination of General Shermans character and his relationship with Ulysses S. Grant. Grant and Sherman had forged over the course of several years a strong friendship and a high-level working relationship that was probably unequaled in military history. Their relationship stemmed from their common backgrounds (geographic and education ) and their abhorrence for military pomp and circumstance; both Sherman and Grant believed that the militarys primary purpose was to wage war, not to parade. Their most significant bond, however, was their sordid backgrounds. Sherman had suffered a nervous breakdown early in the war, while Grant had combated alcoholism. Throughout the war, their peers consistently challenged their capabilities, which only strengthened their friendship and resolution to succeed. Indeed, Sherman once remarked that, He Grant stood by me when I was crazy and I stood by him when he was drunk; and now sir, we stand by each other always. After the brief scrutiny of Union command, Glathaar focuses primarily on the attitudes and experiences of the common soldier, only invoking Shermans name to indicate the reverence the army had for their commander. Glathaar first establishes the composition of Shermans Army. Sherman amassed an army primarily composed of veterans, as:Sherman realized from the start that in c ampaigns to Savannah and through the Carolinas the burdens were going to shift from headquarters to lower-grade officers and enlisted men. Once the march began, success would depend on the ability of company-level soldiers to perform critical tasks independent of high-level officer supervision. As the army was composed primarily of soldiers and officers with several years of service, Shermans troops had more campaign experience than any other Federal Army. In a random sample, Glathaar determines that over 50 percent of Shermans captains and 90 percent of the lieutenants had served in the war as enlisted men, which increased the troops confidence in command. The troops also underwent a grueling physical prior to the Savannah campaign to weed out those soldiers unfit for the expected rigors of the march. The result was that those selected for the campaign had increased morale. The veteran composition of Shermans army and the resulting high morale were largely responsible for different iating Shermans men from the Army of the Potomac. The majority of men involved in the Savannah and Carolina campaigns had faced combat; this necessarily led to the heightened sense of respect and camaraderie indicative of Shermans troops. In addition, Shermans Army was far from the District of Columbia. This distance made the army less vulnerable to the political constraints that faced the Army of the Potomac, which was constantly conducting drills and parades for the entertainment of Washington bureaucrats and politicians. Glathaar illustrates the disparity between Shermans Army and the Army of the Potomac in his introduction:The army that marched with Shermanwas vastly different from the Army of the Potomac. Shermans was an army of veterans, men who had learned the art of soldiering through several years of actual campaigning. Nearly all the troops had received their training in the West, where prolonged campaigns, lengthy marches, supply shortages, and success in battle were the rule rather than the exceptionAt the expense of rigid discipline, precision drills, and tidy appearance, all trademarks of the Army of the Potomac, Shermans command developed a sense of self-reliancebased on several years of active campaigning. The high morale indicative of Shermans army can also be attributed to the soldiers keen awareness of whom and for what they were fighting. The overarching sentiment in the army of veterans was patriotism; it follows that the majority of soldiers fought for the restoration of the Union. Glathaar uses excerpts from soldiers diaries to establish their view of the cause. Consider this statement from a soldier that admitted he would never tirn my back to a reb as long as I have two armes to fight, :An we now like true Soldier go determed not to yeal one inch rather than yeal. We will Stane this Suthrn Soil with our blood. And leave meney of our boddyes there in memory of the day that we Stood like a Stone wall and fight to the last to Conquer this Rebelien or Die. It is interesting to note that the majority of Shermans men did not fight for the purpose of emancipation. In fact, many were unapologetic about their racism. Only after witnessing the barbarism of slavery during the Savannah and Carolina campaigns did their attitudes toward the institution change. Indeed, most troops began to see emancipation as a powerful tool in crushing secession. Glathaar also discusses the election of 1864, and how it related to the cause. Shermans army abhorred the Copperheads, and vehemently supported Lincolns reelection. It was commonplace for the troops to discuss the political situation around the campfire after a long day of campaigning. The idea that Abraham Lincoln had come to represent the struggle to preserve the Union, is evidenced by the polling data. In states where election returns were available, a staggering 86 percent of soldiers cast their ballot for Lincoln. Indeed, many of Shermans soldiers feared that McClellan would end the war without any resolution. One soldier wrote to his girlfriend, If McClellan gets the reins he will have peace sooner than Abe, but by letting them have their slaves. Then we can fight them again in ten years. But let Old Abe settle it, and it is always settled. While Shermans Army did not have incredibly favorable opinions of Blacks, they loathed Southern whites even more. The soldiers not only believed that the educated class of the South had caused the war, they also saw that the same class was responsible for the social stratification of the region. A member of Shermans staff wrote, Talk about negro slavery! If we havent seen white slaves from Atlanta to Goldsboro, I dont know what the word means. Interestingly, the armys hatred of the whole of Southern aristocracy did not prevent some of the men from forming intimate relationships with women who were not spoken for. Perhaps the most controversial subject broached by Glathaar is the pillaging and destruction wrought by She rmans Army. The destruction that Shermans men left in their wake has been somewhat exaggerated and demonized by popular culture. In truth, the mobile nature of Shermans campaign prevented the establishment of viable supply lines, and made foraging for food and supplies a necessary endeavor. Shermans plan of selective destruction was designed to make the South feel the hard hand of war. The destruction of railways and private property was not only aimed at the defeat of the Confederate army, but also had to break the will of the Southern people to resist Federal authority. In a review of Glathaars work, Richard M. McMurry stresses the importance of this distinction:Freed from the necessity of daily fighting, Shermans men could concentrate upon their main mission the wrecking of the Souths infrastructure, especially its railroads, and the crippling of the rebels will to continue the war. By demonstrating both the helplessness of the Confederate government and the danger and suffering to which continued fighting would expose the families of southern soldiers, Shermans march helped to demoralize the rebel armies. Glathaar does not make pillaging and destruction the focal point of his work, however. His intent is to offer an expansive social history of the men who participated in Shermans march. In his introduction, Glathaar indicates that only one scholar before him had undertaken a similar task. Bell Irvin Wiley authored the classic The Life of Billy Yank, which Glathaar considers the starting point for all work on the common soldier. Yet, Wileys work failed to examine thoroughly Shermans Army. Indeed, The Life of Billy Yank has less than two dozen references to Shermans men, instead focusing on the Army of the Potomac. A more recent publication, James M. McPhersons For Cause and Conflict, also concentrated on the social history of the Civil War. Contrary to Glathaar, McPhersons work has a definite thesis: that the men who fought in the Civil War maintained thei r convictions throughout the conflict, and remained stringently attached to the principles of liberty, freedom, and justice. A review of McPhersons work illustrates his thesis further:Soldiers on both sides harkened back to the Founding Fathers, and the ideals of the American Revolution. They fought to defend their country, either the Unionthe best Government ever madeor the Confederate states, where their very homes and families were under siege. And they fought to defend their honor and manhood. I should not lik to go home with the name of a couhard, one Massachusetts private wrote, and another private from Ohio said, My wife would sooner hear of my death than my disgrace. Even after three years of bloody battles, more than half of the Union soldiers reenlisted voluntarily. While duty calls me here and my country demands my services I should be willing to make the sacrifice, one man wrote to his protesting parents. And another soldier said simply, I still love my country. Though M cPherson and Glathaar both make extensive use of the journals and letters of the common soldier, McPherson addresses the soldiers motivations for fighting without broaching more controversial subjects like slavery and racism. Indeed, Glathaar and McPhersons works differ not only in content, but also in the messages each seeks to convey. McPherson is wholly intent on establishing the reasons men fought in the war; Glathaar also establishes the cause, but only as a means of establishing the sociology of Shermans Army:Against this background of the veteran character of Shermans army, I have attempted to develop several peripheral themes. First, the plethora of campaign studies havestripped away much of the reality of warfare. War as seen from a headquarters field tent, although important in understanding the campaign or battle, is very different from war from a soldiers perspective. Glathaar is not the first to investigate Shermans Army, however. The difference between his work and tha t of most other historians is his synthesis of the motivations and feelings of the common soldier within the larger context of Shermans march to the sea. In a review of Glathaars work, John T. Hubbell indicates that Glathaar stresses the role of the enlisted man versus those in high command. Hubbell writes: Others (most notably B.H. Liddell-Hart and Lloyd Lewis) have focused on Sherman and the grand strategy that lead to the sweep through Gerogia and the Carolinas. Though important, such studies necessarily lose the perspective of the soldiers who fought the war and are to that extent unrealistic in their portrayal of the war. In another review of the work, John C. Barrett praises Glathaar for his endeavor. Barrett writes that, The in-depth look at the common soldiers who marched with Sherman marks this volumes contribution to Civil War literature. Glathaar is the first historian not only to record fully what these veterans did, but why they did it. Richard McMurry also concedes tha t Glathaars work is deserved of a place in American history: Glathaar has produced a fine volume that adds greatly to our knowledge of nineteenth-century Americans and their role in the Civil War. The March to the Sea and Beyond: Shermans Troops in the Savannah and Carolina Campaigns certainly has historiographical merit. Glathaar offers a fascinating work that succeeds in entertaining and educating the reader. Through his extensive research on the pervasive attitudes of Shermans soldiers, Glathaars work humanizes the army and enlightens the reader. The sheer complexity of the war becomes apparent through the work, yet certainly gives the reader a greater understanding of the greatest conflict in American history. Works Cited1. Barrett, John G. The March to the Sea and Beyond: Shermans Troops in the Savannah and Carolina Campaigns. The American Historical Review 91, no. 2 (1986): 469. 2. For Cause and Conflict. Civil War Book Review. n.d., http://www.civilwarbookreview.com (5 Decemb er 2000). Cinderelmo Essay3. Glathaar, Joseph T. The March to the Sea and Beyond: Shermans Troops in the Savannah and Carolina Campaigns. New York: New York University Press. 1985. 4. Hubbell, John T. Atlanta to the Sea. Reviews in American History. 14, no. 3 (1986): 377-381. 5. McMurry, Richard M. The March to the Sea and Beyond: Shermans Troops in the Savannah and Carolina Campaigns. The Journal of Southern History. 52, no. 3 (1986): 468.